On GameSpot: Uncharted 2, Final Fantasy XIII, & more!

BNET Insight

Aussie Rules

Business blogs from down under.

Three Steps to Handling Stressed Conversations

February 11th, 2008 @ 4:28 pm

1 Comment

Categories: SMBlog

Tags: Mike, Healthcare, Debbie Mayo-Smith

If you haven’t been involved in one, I’m sure you’ve witnessed a heated conversation between work colleagues in which potentially beneficial discussion gets lost in the tension.

A colleague of mine, Donald Jessep from Profitableteams.com, was describing a heated exchange between Mike, a Financial Controller, and Steve, a Sales Manager. Mike suggested they close one of the company’s branches.

“You can’t do that” was Steve’s retort to Mike’s suggestion. Mike fired back a dirty look and the blood pressure of both men clicked up a notch. Mike’s enthusiasm evaporated and what could have been an idea worth discussing went no further.

If Steve had exercised discipline in applying the three steps of an age-old process there would have been a different outcome to the discussion.

  • Step 1 — Acknowledge the person. Even if you don’t agree with the comment. Acknowledgment can be a smile or the gift of undivided attention.
  • Step 2 — Give a reason to explore another angle. The reason has to be plausible, even encouraging to the person who proposed the idea … and free of all judgment.
  • Step 3 — Ask a question, a high-quality question. A high-quality question demands just the right amount of mental stretch to answer.

They’re simple ideas, but sadly, especially once we become familiar with people we sometimes lack the awareness and discipline to apply them. Highly influential people have this process deeply ingrained and can apply it even under pressure.

 
Reply to Story

BNET TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

     
  • 1

    michaelperla@...

    02/13/08 | Report as spam

    Understand the Interest

    The article makes some good points. We can look to negotiation best practices to add some additional insight. The high quality question is essential to understand the "interests" and reasons that Mike wants to close the office. Without understanding those things, it's almost impossible to craft some creative solutions to meeting his objective and interests - something other than closing the office. It's the distinction between a position vs. interests. The latter is on the surface and the former is underlying.

The following tags are supported in BNET comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. You are currently a guest | Login?
advertisement
Go
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement